Kathmandu. Sometimes the chairman is absconding, sometimes bank employees are arrested. The customer has to go to the door of the bank to sit, saying that the money is lost, and sometimes a borrower will cry saying that the bank has trapped the bank}. By this time, Siddhartha had seen and heard about the bank’s mischief. Now the general public started informing me by holding a press conference that bank was registered by bank managers and bank officials were involved in it. When the government of the citizens is not listening to the problems of the citizens, the victims are carrying pictures of the bank manager and papers , investigate the injustice done to us.

What is ?

Dilip Oli is one of the people who claims that Siddhartha has been misled by and . In a press conference, he accused the MoneyGram branch of Rupandehi of approving loans that he did not sought, issuing loans worth millions of rupees in the name of a blacklisted company by preparing forged documents and using him to cover it up ।

The bank statement shows that the money has come and gone. However , I don’t know if I have signed or transferred money to anyone’s account. The money has been transacted without the knowledge of . is used by someone else to use . And he is saying, “Test whether that signature is mine or not.” If I am wrong, then arrest me, but take action against those who have wronged me.

Oli claims, “It has been found that the process of settling the loans of the blacklisted companies } has been carried out in a planned manner within the bank, and this includes the of the bank. If all the records of the land used by the bank in the name of settling the loans and reducing the bad loans, loan approval documents, date of blacklisting, letter released from the blacklist are examined, then it is necessary to separate the water of milk milk water.

He claimed that he had asked for blank cheques by deceiving him into and later depositing the money in the cheques and sending the money to the accounts of unknown companies. The victim claims that he has used the blacklisted loans to settle the blacklisted loans and for the personal benefit of some people by transacting in his name with companies with which he does not have any long-term relationship with and companies.

“Province chief Sushil Nepal, branch chief Abhishek Kumar Thapa Magar, loan chief Rabin Poudel Chhetri, current chief executive officer Rameshwor Prasad Basyal, head office chief Pradip Panth and chairman of the board of directors Rahul Agrawal have played suspicious roles in such incidents.‘ 

But are his claims all believable? Can Siddhartha happen in a bank? To understand this, we tried to contact the information officer of the bank. However, for some time, due to the interest of many in this case, the information officer did not pick up the phone. Now the question is, can be like this in a bank? Is there a place to believe the so-called victims? The answer is simple. Although it is not possible to say that the claims of the victims are seven percent correct, it is not possible to say that bank is not at fault in this case. Because the dirty game of settlement in banks in the name of bad loans is not new. Moreover, it cannot be said that the bank, which did not arrest the police even when the chairman was absconding, and the absconding chairman was present in the general meeting, did not misbehave on the basis of power and access. If this case had been done in some other good bank, it could have been seen from the angle of whether the loan defaulter was trying to make an excuse, but the infamous past of Siddhartha bank says, “There must be something black in the lentils.” ‘

After the victim held a press conference saying that the bank cheated , the pictures and numbers of the manager should also be made public, now that the bank should be investigated and action should be taken against the accused, or action should be taken against the accused who made absurd allegations against the reputation of others.Whether it’s the fault of the bank or the press conference itself, the of the of the milk should be separated. If we look at the list of past misdeeds, in the case of good governance, Siddhartha Bank is not a bank with such a good track record. But this does not mean that bank is always bad. It should also be seen from the angle of whether the bank has been corrected by sponsoring Nepali cricket. But again, the truth is that a bank cannot to stress a citizen forever by hanging the trap of saying that the relationship is forever.

And really, of the bank, Bank should not take action against the officer who did notpick up the phone even when such a scandal came out? Or pick up the phone? Or shirking responsibility? Either face the media, or don’t be bullied. And there is no reason why the public should not understand that the mischief of the {{} bank is not the same because of the allegations that the bank does not speak. (Video)

https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=yi9JLKhxK-8