Kathmandu. In this country, there is a bank named NIMB . is a tank in the bank. He has his first rank in misgovernance, and mischief. In stealing the customer’s money, he is even more franc. compliance blank, for prank as usual. Yes, there is a bank in this country.

NIMB Bank, where confirms where the customer’s money is not safe. The reason is that has been proved to be involved in stealing the customer’s money. is so negligent in the bank that the PCs run the core banking system and steal the money of the customers. This is not an accusation, it is a proven fact. The employee had a heart attack by giving torture to the bank by the boss’s ‘ torture employee jumped into the river and killed himself, such things have become normal in the bank. Stealing a customer’s money,it’ s a case of for {{} for the bank . CEO has been in many controversies since auctioning government property. Where is the case of Deputy CEO Mahesh Sharma Dhakal misbehaving with a woman , Bank should know, Director from the election, Bank Operation is disputed. The bank is still running and will continue to operate even after the bad loans cut the hill.

After examining all these facts, it seems that NIMB is not safe for the customers, but now it has come to light that this bank is in a game of auctioning the government property and making the state naked. I have access to all of my own leaders, my own state machinery and just as has been found to have auctioned the assets of {{} bank of the company. And now Nepal Investment Mega Bank Bank Government property has been dragged into controversy and investigation on sensitive issues like auction.

Let’s understand what the event is

Smart Telecom has sunk. The company came under government ownership after going bankrupt without paying billions of money owed to the state. After failing to pay the billions of to the state, the property of the government’s company also belonged to the government. However, the government’s property, without the government’s knowledge, NIMB was auctioned by . The auction will also be given to the company that has an interest in the auction.

The company that had invested the bank would not have been able to auction the property of the government , would not have been able to auction the property of the government. But why not do we do it, NIMB Bank forcibly sold the government property. The bankrupt Smartcell and NIMB collaborated to put the 30 billion rupees that should have come into the state treasury at risk. But how much of the wrongdoing, how much cover-up and bullying will last? Finally, the case was dragged into the investigation and the then managing director of Smart Telecom, Sarbesh Joshi, was arrested by the police for investigation in this case.

Now there will be an investigation on how the property that has legally become the property of the state was made into someone else in collusion with the bank.

Now you may also think that bank invested , the loan was not raised, the property was auctioned. But no, no. In the beginning, the state had to collect Rs 30 billion. Only then would it be the turn of to auction the bank. There cannot be a small bank above the state.

On the other hand, the government agency had already instructed to freeze the accounts of the company. However, in the case of , the bank’s loan was settled.

is not limited to this. Instead, it is found that on September 20, 2080 BS, Sarbesh Joshi signed a letter of authority to auction the property to NIMB Bank when he did not have legal authority. That is, to make it more clear, Joshi signed for auction the property which Joshi had no right to, and on the basis of that signature, the bank auctioned . That too for the company that Joshi wanted.

The company that accepted the company’s assets had offered Rs 4.60 billion for that property. The other two applicants had offered Rs 44 crore and Rs 42 crore. It also had a distinct smell of setting. Moreover, it appears that the creditor of the company that accepts the property and the creditor of the auction company are the same person. Can there be anything greater than non-compliance and betrayal of the state?

According to the Unified Directive of the Regulator Nepal Rashtra Bank, there is a legal obligation to treat the loan of a borrower company as a ‘bad loan’ and provide 100 percent loss in case of closure or bankruptcy.But Nepal Investment Mega Bank did not do so. Instead, Smart Telecom’s debt was shown to be a good loan for a long time, and the government forcibly auctioned off the assets that had already been sold by the government.

The concern is not that the old man is dead, but that the time has passed. In this case, there is a fear of death if the officials of Nepal Investment Mega Bank are not investigated strictly. No one is above the rule of law and rule of law of the state. (Video)

https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=HH_uUPL4bEE