Kathmandu. A few days ago, a borrower held a press conference saying that an employee of Siddhartha bank had taken out a loan in his name and sent the money to the bank account of bank without his knowledge. It was not an accusation, but a fact. After the statement clearly showed the misconduct of the employees of the bank, the bank suspended two employees . The employees are now incommunicado after the bank suspended . The case is pending with the Rastra Bank, the Ministry of Finance, the CIB and other bodies. Shortly after such a serious incident came out, another mischief committed by the employees of the bank has also come to light. It has been revealed that employees of the bank had given a loan of Rs. 50 lakhs bycreating fake creditors of someone else’s land in collusion with the employees of {{} bank, and after the incident reached the police, it was revealed that the employees of bank were absconding. And today we are digging into the fact about the mischief committed by the bank employee of the bank.

Let’s first understand what the event is

Mohan Bahadur Shahi was a Saudi Arab in connection with the employment of a foreigner. He owned land in Pokhara Metropolitan City Ward No. 30 and used to travel to Nepal. Thinking that he would earn some money abroad and return to Nepal and live a comfortable life, he was for the past 15 and was sweating } abroad. He arrived in Nepal on April 11. was a return flight on April 17. Where is the land certificate of land in his name {{} who is going abroad again? He asked. Mohan Bahadur suspected when he said that he had taken a loan of in the bank and sometimes . He then went to the Land Revenue Office and went to the Land RevenueOffice and found that Siddhartha Bank had frozen his land .

land owned, abroad, How did the bank withhold ? Mohan Bahadur was confused. Then he went to Siddhartha bank. When I went to the bank , it was revealed that his wife Vanti Shahi had shown that she was my husband, Bhadra Thapa, and had taken the loan by stamping Mohan Bahadur’s deed correctly . 

Plot No. The land of 2444 and 2447 was forked overnight by making fake documents claiming that it was the land of Bhadra Bahadur Thapa and a loan of Rs 5 million was taken out from the bank, but the bank does not verify just because one of them is mine? To answer this question, you need to go to the settings of bank employees . 

A gang including Mohan Bahadur’s wife set up everywhere from the land post to the ward. Siddhartha employees of the bank also supported in this setting. And finally, Siddhartha Bank gave a loan of Rs. 50 lakhs on the basis of forged papers of the fake landowner without the knowledge of the real landowner. 

When Shahi came to know that his land was frozen in the bank on the basisof the correct seal, he went to the police. The police arrested some of them and started investigation. The police have not been able to find out where Vivek Lamichhane, an employee of the bank, ran away.Finally, the case has reached the Kaski District Court. What punishment will be given to the culprits in this case is a matter for the court, but the issue of the bank giving loans on the basis of fake documents is serious. 

There is no doubt that was clearly involved in the bank employees. Because, when a bank takes a loan for the first time by pledging any land , it should have physical verification. That is, employees of the bank should go to the field and make it clear whether the land is there or not, whether the land has been acquired according to the certificate or not, whether the land is in the name of the borrower or not. However, did not know whether the employees of the bank went to the field or not, but bank gave loan by keeping fake land.

The loan of in the bank is not limited to the S or Noma of an employee. But the loan has been given from all sides with the correct . Ignoring the ver ification of the field at the time of granting the loan, there is room for to suspect {{} that the employee of the bank is involved in this case. Manju Adhikari, an employee of the bank, said in her statement to the police, that the branch manager of the bank was on leave when the loan was approved. He claimed that he had looked at the documents in the system and when it was corrected, he went ahead and did not know that he had forged the documents.

Tirtha Raj Ghimire, manager of the bank, has given a statement to the police that the borrower has misled the bank.On the contrary, he has claimed that and the employees of the bank are also victims in this case. Niraj Shrestha, chief of the bank’s Gandaki Province, has admitted that the original verification is needed in the statement of the police.But she claims that someone came and deceived her that he was my husband. In his statement to the police, he said that he deliberately did not disburse the loan. However, there is no argument in the statement as to whether he did it deliberately or not. He has given a statement that he was deceived by the deceivers, so he gave the loan without the original verification. The statement of the Gandaki Province Chief has also made it clear, “It is a mistake on the part of the bank. ‘

Vivek Lamichhane is absconding after reaching the police.The police have registered a case against him as absconding. There is a legal provision that Lamichhane will be automatically suspended after the police file a case against him as absconding in the court. However , Prasanna Khadka, the information officer of the bank, says that he has not run away, nor has he been suspended. Is it now? If he has not escaped, why did the police file a case against him? And shouldn’t those employees have to be suspended automatically after a case of fraud or banking offense has been registered? Or is the bank hiding Vivek Lamichhane? This is another matter to be investigated on the basis of the statement of Information Officer Prasanna Khadka. 

Now the question arises, should I take my land ownership certificate with me while going abroad? Or should I freeze all the property in my name in some way while going abroad? How can Siddhartha Bank hold someone’s land without the original verification of ? As the head of the bank’s state said, verification should be done, but do we get happy that we have been deceived? Will you maintain trust in the bank in this way? And can it be said that the police have already said that the employee is absconding? Is there always a relationship between the bank and the bank?

We say again, it is an organization that is trusted by millions of customers. The bank should not talk to children about such a serious matter. The rest is the court, the court separates the milk from the water. (Video)

https://www. youtube. com/watch? v=a9D92j0oGfo